HARDMAN LAWYER
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Ask Us About Your DUI Case
    • Confidential DUI Online Inquiry Form
  • Where is your case?
    • Enter the location of your case
    • Athens DUI Lawyer
    • Atlanta DUI Lawyer
    • Banks County DUI Lawyer
    • Barrow County DUI Lawyer
    • Blue Ridge DUI Lawyer
    • Buford DUI Lawyer
    • Clayton County DUI Lawyer
    • Clayton Georgia DUI Lawyer
    • Cobb County DUI Lawyer
    • Cumming DUI Lawyer
    • Dahlonega DUI Lawyer
    • Dekalb County DUI Lawyer
    • Flowery Branch DUI Lawyer
    • Fulton County DUI Lawyer
    • Duluth DUI Lawyer
    • Gainesville DUI Lawyer
    • Gwinnett County DUI Lawyer
    • DUI Lawyer Lawrenceville
    • Newnan DUI Lawyer
    • Oakwood DUI Lawyer
    • Smyrna DUI Lawyer
    • Rabun County DUI Lawyer
    • Roswell DUI Lawyer
    • Statham DUI Lawyer
    • Suwannee DUI Lawyer
    • Winder DUI Lawyer
  • Traffic tickets
    • Is my Georgia Driver's License suspended now?
    • Traffic tickets and points on your license
    • Case Inquiry Form
    • Speeding tickets
  • DUI Cases In Georgia
  • Do I need a 30-Day Letter in my DUI Case?
  • Is my Georgia Driver's License suspended now?
  • Drug Possession in Georgia
  • Car Wreck/Personal Injury
  • Criminal Law Blog, Case Results and DUI news
  • City or County of DUI arrest
  • About

Georgia DUI Case Law
​Updates and News

William S. Hardman, Jr.
​Attorney at Law

Challenging Marijuana DUI cases in Georgia

9/7/2015

0 Comments

 
DUI cases in the State of Georgia are complicated cases because marijuana affects people differently.  The Georgia DUI statutes and the case law are also conflicting.  The Georgia statute which applies to Georgia marijuana DUI cases is O.C.G.A. 40-6-391 (a)(6).  This statute says that a person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of a moving vehicle if there is any amount of marijuana present in the person's blood, urine or both including metabolites and derivatives of each or both without regard to whether or not any alcohol is present in the person's breath or blood.  
A latter section (b) of this statute states that the fact that a person is legally entitled to use a drug shall not constitute a defense to the charge of DUI marijuana, however, a person shall not be in violation of this statute unless they are rendered incapable of driving safely as a result of using the drug (marijuana).  
Picture
Equal Protection Challenge
The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits states from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Generally, whether or not an equal protection clause has been violated arises when a state grants a particular class of individuals the right to engage in an activity yet denies other individuals the same right.  A Georgia defendant made an equal protection challenge in the case of Love v. State, 271 Ga. 398, 517 S.E.2d 53 (1999) after he was arrested for a marijuana DUI in Gwinnett County.  You can read the entire case here: Love v. State (1999). This case was a constitutional challenge to the Georgia marijuana DUI law and the argument was that the Georgia law singles out drivers with low levels of marijuana metabolites in their systems for punishment while other drivers may not be punished under the statute if they legally had marijuana in their system and were otherwise unimpaired.  For example, if a person legally had marijuana in their system (had a medical marijuana prescription from another state or presently had consumed marijuana in a state where it is now legal under state law to consume marijuana), they would not be subject to a charge of DUI marijuana unless they were rendered incapable of driving safely because they had consumed marijuana.  If a Georgia resident was arrested for DUI and had marijuana in his/her system (the same as the driver with a medical marijuana prescription or otherwise) he/she would be subject to prosecution for a DUI marijuana in Georgia. Thus, as stated above, Georgia law grants a particular class of individuals the right to engage in an activity yet denies other individuals the same right.  This different treatment of two different groups of people is why the equal protection challenge was made in the case. 
Making the equal Protection Challenge
The Georgia marijuana law was attacked for being unconstitutional.  When a statute is attacked for being unconstitutional, the statute is presumed to be constitutional.  Different constitutional challenges are examined by the courts using different types of tests.  An equal protection challenge is examined under the "rational relationship test."  The question that has to be answered under the rational relationship test is:
  • Whether or not a rational relationship exists between the statute at issue and a legitimate state interest.
The Court in Love v. State held that there was a rational basis for the Georgia law that prohibits drivers from driving with any level or marijuana in their system because there is a legitimate state interest in shielding the public from drivers with any level of illicit drugs [marijuana] in their system.  
The defendant in Love v. State succeeded in showing that Georgia statute on marijuana DUI cases was unconstitutional by showing that the statute violated the equal protection clause by "arbitrarily changing the burden of proof of guilt."  The two different scenarios are:
  • A person who had marijuana in his system legally could only be convicted of a marijuana DUI in Georgia if he/she had been shown to be incapable of driving safely because he/she had consumed marijuana;
  • At the same time, a person who had marijuana in his/her system illegally could be found guilty of a marijuana DUI simply based on the fact that the drug was in their system, regardless of whether or not they were shown to be impaired by the drug. 
Ruling in the Case
The Court held that there was no legislative distinction between users of legal and illegal marijuana as to the purpose of the statute; public safety.  Therefore, the Court held that the statute was arbitrarily drawn and constituted an unconstitutional denial of equal protection under the law.
What this Case Means and How It Applies
The holding in Love v. State is significant because it means that the State must prove that a driver with marijuana in his/her system must be rendered incapable of driving safely because of the marijuana he/she had consumed.  The fact that there is a positive drug test for marijuana is not the end of the inquiry in a marijuana DUI case.  There must be other evidence to prove guilt in a marijuana DUI case: driving unsafe, physical manifestations of impairment, or poor performance on field sobriety tests.  If the prosecution is unable to show any evidence of impairment, a person should not be found guilty of a marijuana DUI in the State of Georgia.  
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Blog posts by Bill Hardman at DUI Blog and Case Results

    Archives

    January 2021
    October 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    May 2019
    December 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    February 2018
    August 2017
    October 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed


DUI In Georgia
Ask Us About Your Case
Where Was Your DUI
Car Wreck
Personal Injury
Traffic Tickets
About
Contact 

William Starr Hardman Jr.Reviewsout of 21 reviews
NCDD National College for DUI Defense: William Hardman
William Starr Hardman Jr.Clients’ ChoiceAward 2019
William Starr Hardman Jr.Clients’ ChoiceAward 2018
Elite Lawyer Badge
William S. Hardman, Jr., P.C.
210 Washington Street, NW, Suite 104
P. O. Box 438 
Gainesville, GA 30503

Phone 770-530-1164
​
Fax 844-894-2462
Email: Bill@HardmanLawyer.com​

No information contained on this website is to be construed as legal advice in your case.  Please consult with a licensed Georgia attorney before making any legal decisions in your case.
 
Picture


©2015 | William S Hardman Jr. Attorney at Law | All Rights Reserved
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Ask Us About Your DUI Case
    • Confidential DUI Online Inquiry Form
  • Where is your case?
    • Enter the location of your case
    • Athens DUI Lawyer
    • Atlanta DUI Lawyer
    • Banks County DUI Lawyer
    • Barrow County DUI Lawyer
    • Blue Ridge DUI Lawyer
    • Buford DUI Lawyer
    • Clayton County DUI Lawyer
    • Clayton Georgia DUI Lawyer
    • Cobb County DUI Lawyer
    • Cumming DUI Lawyer
    • Dahlonega DUI Lawyer
    • Dekalb County DUI Lawyer
    • Flowery Branch DUI Lawyer
    • Fulton County DUI Lawyer
    • Duluth DUI Lawyer
    • Gainesville DUI Lawyer
    • Gwinnett County DUI Lawyer
    • DUI Lawyer Lawrenceville
    • Newnan DUI Lawyer
    • Oakwood DUI Lawyer
    • Smyrna DUI Lawyer
    • Rabun County DUI Lawyer
    • Roswell DUI Lawyer
    • Statham DUI Lawyer
    • Suwannee DUI Lawyer
    • Winder DUI Lawyer
  • Traffic tickets
    • Is my Georgia Driver's License suspended now?
    • Traffic tickets and points on your license
    • Case Inquiry Form
    • Speeding tickets
  • DUI Cases In Georgia
  • Do I need a 30-Day Letter in my DUI Case?
  • Is my Georgia Driver's License suspended now?
  • Drug Possession in Georgia
  • Car Wreck/Personal Injury
  • Criminal Law Blog, Case Results and DUI news
  • City or County of DUI arrest
  • About